DOI 10.60531/INSIGHTOUT.2023.1.4| HAMMETT: WHAT FUTURE FOR QUEER COWS?_ INSIGHTOUT 1(2023)23that may exist beyond them being seen as entirelydisposable.Fat, Queer and Anti-socialFat activism emerged in the 1960s and 1970s in theUS and deployed practices such as protests, sit-insat diet clinics, conferences, and books, with the aimto critique and fight against fat discrimination inmedical discourse and society at large.8The discipline of Fat Studies has ties to fat activism and isa broad field organised around critical scholarshipsurrounding discourse relating to“obesity”, in particular challenging links made between fatness and illhealth. Queer theory and queer studies are similarlybroad disciplines with indeterminacy at their heart;as Annamarie Jagose has written:“[q]ueer describesthose gestures or analytical models which dramatize incoherencies in the allegedly stable relationsbetween chromosomal sex, gender and sexual desire.”9In this section of the essay, I argue—followingFrancis Ray White—that there is conceptual roomfor fatness to fall into the realm of queerness, setting the scene for the cooptation of cows into thesediscourses.10Fat Studies scholars have frequently drawn on queerstudies to aid in their thinking around fat issues.11Inthis piece, I will be concentrating on one particularexample of the generative overlaps of Fat Studiesand Queer Studies. Lee Edelman’s influential book,No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, hinges on the premise that Western society is predicated on the notion of“reproductive futurism”(thatis, the confining of political discourse to heteronormativity) that denies a queer resistance that wouldopen up other ways of doing and being.12Edelmanbelieves that this insistence of seeing queer futuresas“other,” as not possible, amounts to queernessbeing equated with the death drive, the drive tonothingness, oblivion.13Francis Ray White in their2012 article“Fat, Queer, Dead:‘Obesity’ and theDeath Drive” applies the same conceptual lens tothe case of narratives surrounding the Change4Life campaign, an anti-obesity campaign launched bythe UK government in 2009 with the aim of encouraging behavioural changes leading to all individuals being able to maintain a healthy weight.14White suggests that there is room enough in Edelman’s definition of“queer” for the concept of fatness to be included. This is because Edelman acknowledges that there are many in the LGBTQIA+community who do conform to“reproductive futurism” and so conceives of“queer” as something thatdisrupts the social order. Edelman contends that“[t]he queer must insist on disturbing, on queering,social organization as such—on disturbing, therefore and on queering ourselves and our investment insuch organization”15. White believes that this definition has sufficient scope to encompass the theorisation of fat as queer, because being fat is to commita“catalogue of transgressions[…] against normative standards of gender and sexuality, health andmorality”16.8See Vikki Chalklin,“Obstinate fatties: Fat activism, queer negativity, and the celebration of‘obesity’”,Subjectivity, 9/2(2016)107–125.9Annamarie Jagose, Queer Theory:An Introduction(New York, 1996), 3.10See White"Fat, Queer, Dead"(see n. 7).11See Kathleen LeBesco,“Quest for a Cause: The Fat Gene, the Gay Gene, and the New Eugenics”, in Esther Rothblum and SondraSolovay(eds.),The Fat Studies Reader(New York, 2009), 65–74; Samantha Murray,The‘Fat’ Female Body(Basingstoke, 2008).12See Edelman,No Future(see n. 6).13The concept of the death drive was originated by Freud. To learn more about it see Matei Georgescu,“Freud’s Theory of the DeathDrive”,Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 10(2011), 228–233.14See White,"Fat, Queer, Dead"(see n. 7).15Edelman, No Future, 17(see n. 6).16See White,"Fat, Queer, Dead", 5(see n. 7).