DOI 10.60531/INSIGHTOUT.2024.2.10| DENK: LIGHTS AND SHADOWS_ INSIGHTOUT 2(2024) 73the care of its fountains and wells, and an argumentwas also made that the planned construction of thedistrict hospital was contingent on a modern watersupply. In the end, a majority of councillors approvedthe continuation of the work.20Major discussions on this project then ceased forsome time and were resumed only after the council meeting in January 1935, when, on the recommendation of the State Construction Authority inBrno, a competition was announced for the implementation of the intended project.21The best bidwas submitted by the Emil Káš company from Brnofor CSK1,127,691.80. After a lengthy discussion, thecompany was also awarded the contract for carrying out the water supply connections for houses forCSK208.250.22Construction work finally began on 20 June 1935.23At the same time, the entrepreneur undertook toemploy local craftsmen and labourers and to observe the forty-hour working week.24A large part of the project had already been completed by the end of 1935, by which time most of thebuildings in the town were connected to the watersupply. Rules regarding tap fees were also approved.It was decided to levy a general water charge, whereby everyone had to pay a certain amount whetherthey were connected to the water supply or not. Theprice was also based on the number of rooms thatcould be connected to the water supply. The pricewas determined according to the actual consumption where water meters had already been installed.25However, the main construction was not completeduntil August 1936, when the water supply was handed over for temporary use.26Work on it continuedin the following years, for example in connection withthe construction of the hospital or the growth of thetown – the building of new housing developments.27The aqueduct was officially approved as late as 19April 1940.28However, the capacity of the water supply systemwas already showing a deficit around 1939, especially after its connection to the newly establisheddistrict hospital, when austerity measures had to betaken. The crisis was then exacerbated by the severedrought of 1942, when the yield of the springs fromwhich the water supply was drawn dropped significantly. The population hoped for autumn and winterrainfall, but it did not come at the expected intensity and there were great fears of a catastrophe oreven a natural disaster in the town. Drinking waterwas then again drawn from the town’s wells, and theoperation of the hospital was also threatened. It wasnot until December 1943 that the water supply wasreinforced with water from the spring in Vávra Meadow near Pohledka.2920SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 218/211,Book of minutes of the meetings of the municipal council 1931–1933.Session of 28 July 1933.21SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 218/211,Book of minutes of the meetings of the municipal council 1931–1933. Session of 18 January1835.22SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město,218/211,Book of minutes of the meetings of the municipal council 1931–1933.Session of 6 September1935.23Chronicle of New Town in Moravia(1919) 1922–1938,109.24Chronicle of New Town in Moravia(1919) 1922–1938,108. He also kept a proper construction diary of the whole project, whichhas been preserved in the State District Archive in Žďár nad Sázavou. For more details, see SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 789/386,Hygienic conditions: watercourse modifications.25SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 219/212,Book of minutes of meetings of the municipal council 1934–1937.Session of 6 December 1935.26SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 789/386,Hygienic conditions: watercourse modifications.27SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 220/213,Book of minutes of meetings of the municipal council 1937–1940.Session of 8 October 1937.28SOkA Žďár, AM Nové Město, 789/386,Hygienic conditions: watercourse modifications.29Kladiwa, Pokludová and Kafková,Lesk a bída,170(see n. 3).